General question, when there is a `TODO` in the co...
# dev-metaflow
m
General question, when there is a
TODO
in the code base like this one here, is it reasonable to assume that this would be open to a PR from a contributor? Or would you still expect a Github issue to be made to discuss it in detail first? I ask, as the contributor guidelines state that Metaflow is open to small PRs without an initial Github issue. If that is too generic a question to answer for the general case (which I appreciate might well be the case πŸ™‚ ) then how about this particular instance? Would you prefer an issue to discuss refactoring this particular function?
βœ… 1
a
@mammoth-rainbow-82717 for a small and non-invasive PR, it’s okay to start with a PR. For this particular case, it would be best to have a short discussion to align on the nature of the change.
m
ok, cool. Makes sense.
Didn't have any particular change in mind, to be honest. I just saw the comment in the code and wondered if you would be open to a PR/issue on the subject.
a
Please feel free to open new issues πŸ™‚ We are always happy to discuss how the code base can be further improved upon!
m
cool. I'll have a think and put some ideas down in an issue.
among us party 1