Feedback on… all of Metaflow 😅 I realize this comment is potentially unhelpful but: after using Metaflow, I think it’s an incredibly powerful tool, and likely more mature and feature rich than ZenML pipelines, ClearML pipelines, SageMaker pipelines, and probably the other ones like Flyte, Kubeflow, etc. And yet… I find myself drawn to the shininess of Mage’s, ClearML’s, and Dagster’s UIs! (Metaflow’s UI absolutely beats Airflow haha) They’re pretty. I think they make it easier to look through the logs of your DAGs. I believe they help you inspect artifacts from your DAG directly from the UI. They help you link Metadata such as tags and URLs in visible places, such as the git repo with the code that produces the DAG or previews of the artifacts. I will say, I also love the way some of the DAG frameworks don’t use a class to define a DAG instead of putting everything on the “self.” reference. There are some legit feature requests here, but also an overall comment: I think people love a beautiful, powerful UI and it helps build excitement internally about adopting a tool when that’s in place. Anyway: our team picked Metaflow because we think it’s the most robust, user friendly DAG tool out there specifically for DS and the team behind it are incredibly knowledgable. We also love that it’s open source although we do pay for the managed version and are happy.