If I have a collections of metaflows to run I usua...
# ask-metaflow
l
If I have a collections of metaflows to run I usually use
makefile
as the orchestrator in a pattern like
make flow1.o; make flow2.o
. As sometimes makefile can be cumbersome to use if the use cases becomes too complex, I wonder if there’s any other better alternatives of makefile? Is it possible to use a metaflow to run metaflows?
1
v
great question! For production settings where you want to run things automatically, you can use
@trigger_on_finish
to create a flow of flows for
makefile
style local cases we don't have a built-in solution yet, but you can surely create a Metaflow that does
call(['python', 'flow.py', 'run])
in steps
l
for
makefile
style local cases we don’t have a built-in solution yet, but you can surely create a Metaflow that does
call(['python', 'flow.py', 'run])
in steps
Thank you very much for the prompt response! So it’s a valid use case to use a metaflow to run metaflows 😄 just wanna make sure that I wasn’t crazy for thinking that route
v
not at all! One day that pattern will be supported more officially 🙏
l
Thank you! Really looking forward to that!
👍 1